Plug agents in
Generate an API key or install the official n8n node. Any agent framework — Claude, LangChain, custom code, n8n workflows — can start reading and writing within minutes.
Agents can do real GRC work — drafting controls, assessing vendors, triaging findings, completing recurring tasks. But only if the platform beneath them is built for it. Kordon is API-first, fully connected, and schema-extensible by design — the same substrate behind GRC engineering.
Agentic GRC is a way of running a governance, risk and compliance programme where AI agents carry out defined pieces of the work — drafting a control, assessing a vendor, triaging a finding, closing a recurring task — and a person approves the parts that carry consequence.
The word doing the work there is defined. An agent needs a scope it cannot exceed, context it can read without being handed it, and a record of everything it changed. Those are properties of the platform underneath rather than of the model on top, which is why two products can both claim agentic GRC and mean very different things by it.
Kordon doesn't bolt AI onto GRC. It gives you a structured, addressable, fully-connected platform that agents — yours, ours, or third-party — can operate against with confidence.
Generate an API key or install the official n8n node. Any agent framework — Claude, LangChain, custom code, n8n workflows — can start reading and writing within minutes.
Turn unstructured input — meeting notes, vendor questionnaires, ticket exports — into connected assets, risks, controls, and requirement mappings. Agents do the translation; you review the result.
Vendor reviews, control description updates, finding triage, evidence collection, task completion. Agents handle the repeatable parts of running a security program while humans focus on judgment calls.
Agents propose; humans approve. Assign agent-drafted work for review, require sign-off on high-impact changes, and use Kordon's permissions model to scope exactly what agents are allowed to do.
Agentic GRC isn't about AI-generated checkboxes. It's about agents doing real work — reading context, making connections, updating state, and leaving an audit trail. Kordon's architecture makes that possible.
Every action available in the Kordon UI is available through the API. Risks, controls, tasks, assets, vendors, findings, connections, custom fields — all readable, writable, and automatable. No hidden surface area.
Orchestrate multi-step agent workflows visually. Trigger actions in Kordon from external events, or chain agent reasoning steps across your tools. Full parity with the API — the same complete object model.
Risks, controls, assets, vendors, business processes, requirements, findings — everything connects to everything. Agents can reason across the mesh instead of dealing with flat, disconnected records.
Agents can extend the schema with typed custom fields that look and work exactly like built-in ones. Capture exactly the context your agents need without waiting on a vendor roadmap.
Agents don't just create records — they complete recurring tasks, attach evidence, and trigger health propagation across assets, vendors, and processes. The platform computes state; agents operate on it.
Every create, update, and completion is attributable and timestamped. Agent-driven changes flow through the same controls as human changes, with the same audit trail auditors already trust.
The same vocabulary gets attached to products that work in genuinely different ways. This is the distinction that matters when you are evaluating one.
| Traditional GRC | AI copilot | Agentic GRC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | A person, in the interface | A person, working from suggested text | An agent, inside a scope you set |
| What the AI produces | Nothing | Wording for a human to accept or reject | Changes to records, tasks and state |
| Where context comes from | Whatever the person remembers to look up | Whatever fits in the prompt | The platform's connected object model |
| How work gets reviewed | Peer review, when there is time for it | The person edits before saving | Approval before high-impact changes commit |
| What the auditor sees | Manual edit history | Manual edit history | The same attributable, timestamped trail as human work |
| What it asks of the platform | A usable interface | A text field and a model | Full API coverage, connected objects, scoped permissions |